[Tagging] graves and relations
Mateusz Konieczny
matkoniecz at tutanota.com
Tue Jan 25 13:48:20 UTC 2022
type=person is disputed and dubious at best
Jan 24, 2022, 06:53 by osm.tagging at thorsten.engler.id.au:
>
> Relations don’t always directly describe geospatial objects.
>
>
> They often describe concepts which are related to geospatial objects (the members).
>
>
>
>
>
> As such, a type=person relation, with member roles like birthplace, gravesite, mentioned, designed_by (relating architects and buildings), … might be appropriate.
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Thorsten
>
>
>
>
>
> From:> Peter Elderson <pelderson at gmail.com>
> Sent:> Monday, 24 January 2022 11:49
> To:> Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging at openstreetmap.org>
> Subject:> Re: [Tagging] graves and relations
>
>
>
>
> I can't really see a person as a mappable geographical object.
>
>
> Seems to me you are looking for a way to tag an object with a (long) value list. AFAIK this does not exist in OSM. Might be a valuable addition, though. The semicolon sepated list in one attribute value is very limited.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Op ma 24 jan. 2022 om 00:19 schreef Anne-Karoline Distel <> annekadistel at web.de> >
>
>
>>
>>
>> https://limerick1916.ul.ie/the-1916-memorial/>> mentions the following men
>>
>> Edward Daly - >> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3321092
>>
>> Con Colbert - >> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3321067
>>
>> "Inscribed on another plaque are the names of the 16 men who were
>> executed during May 1916". All 16 have wikidata or wikipedia entries:
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Executed_participants_in_the_Easter_Rising>> .
>>
>> Anne
>>
>>
>> On 23/01/2022 22:16, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> >
>> > sent from a phone
>> >
>> >> On 23 Jan 2022, at 19:47, Anne-Karoline Distel <>> annekadistel at web.de>> > wrote:
>> >> I don't see how else to solve the problem of having several names with potential wikidata entries and limited characters in the inscription field connected to one object.
>> >
>> > Are there really memorials for so many people with wikidata entries that a relation is technically required? Almost nobody (compared to the total number, every village and every quarter has its world war memorial) on these memorials has a wikidata object, nor is it likely they will ever get one.
>> >
>> > Cheers Martin
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Tagging mailing list
>> > >> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> > >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
>
>
> Vr gr Peter Elderson
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220125/63428df5/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list