[Tagging] Deprecating phone=* in favor of more ambiguity in the database

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Jan 28, 2022, 19:58 by letopographefou at gmail.com:

> Wow... I find this totally abusing. It's not because some people are in a regular disagreement on a topic that the one which is not well-known in the project is wrong. 
>
The warning was quite clear.

> And did you fire someone with no concertation, only by yourself ?
>
That is how moderation operates on most places across internet
and it is normal.

>  I thought OSM was an open project, i did not read any violence from him.
>
This is not the only valid reason for banning. In fact, if you restrict it solely to
that then it is nearly impossible to get banned at all (except very theoretical cases
of people able to cause violence via text).


> It's not because a topic has already been discussed that it is forbidden to be discussed again and the subject owner be bannished. Please review your position.
>

The situation was different, it is easily noticeable that repetitive discussions are
not ban worthy by itself.

Ban happened on repeat restart of exactly the same discussion, started with zero
explanation what changed since last time, after a very clear and explicit warning.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220128/8968de5f/attachment.htm>