[Tagging] Documenting entrance=shop

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Jun 5, 2022, 15:51 by dieterdreist at gmail.com:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 5 Jun 2022, at 12:41, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>>
>> in cases where footway leads to a building geometry and there is node shared
>> by building and footway, I think that noexit=yes generally used to mark dead ends
>> is also OK (the same for road terminating in a building wall for some reason)
>>
>
>
> we are not going to draw footways for every shop window (typical situation for entrance=no, as every shop window may get a housenumber and often has, so) the same shop has potentially several numbers and for addressing they will either use one of them (where the actually used entrance is) or will use a list like 33/35/37 or 33-37, etc.
>

it applies only to cases where for some reason highway=footway/path/etc is
mapped leading into wall or should be mapped this way

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220605/28400b06/attachment.htm>