[Tagging] Documenting entrance=shop

[Mateusz Konieczny]

7 cze 2022, 01:11 od dieterdreist at gmail.com:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 6 Jun 2022, at 14:32, Tobias Knerr <osm at tobias-knerr.de> wrote:
>> I consider entrance=shop a bad idea because it leads to mixing different attributes in the same key. Specifically:
>>
>> * Which kind of entrance is it? (main, service, ...)
>> * What is it an entrance _to_? (shop, home, ...)
>>
>> It would be much saner to invent a second key for the "shop" value (entrance_to=shop).
>>
>
>
> in the case of a shop entrance it could be argued that it is also a type of entrance. Nobody did answer to my question from Sunday: “ is it the kind of entrance (door, etc.) that defines it? If someone lived in a shop structure which isn’t a shop but only an apartment (by use), and had a door to the street, would that be entrance=shop (because of entrance typology) or entrance=home (because it leads to a home)?”
>
Then it would be entrance=home/entrance=yes for me (defining function/importance).

To people disliking entrance=shop/garage: feel free to make a thread proposing
replacements and/or discussion whether this tagging is problematic and should be
avoided.

There are definitely some voices here claiming that this tagging scheme is problematic,
if you think that there is support for this position it can be relatively easily checked.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220607/1a1436b7/attachment.htm>