[Tagging] RFC: school:for (to map special education and other ambiguous cases)

[Pieter Vander Vennet]

Hi Mateuz,

1) Yes, exactly. I've clarified this in the wiki
2) In this case, school:for=blind;normal_students would be used. One can 
also consider to use a scheme such as 
`school:for:<target_group>=yes|no|limited|only`, for now I do think that 
using a ';'-separated list would be the simplest solution.
3) normal_abled_student or normal_abled_person might be a politically 
correcter term for this; but I opted for 'normal_student' as this also 
implies a normal age for the type of school. I'll also wait for the 
input of other people here

Kind regards,
Pieter

On 16.06.22 21:29, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging wrote:
> 1) how to tag cases where multiple apply? school:for=blind;deaf ?
>
> 2) how to tag cases where school is both for people bling and also for 
> people not blind?
> how to distinguish from school only for blind?
>
> 2) normal_students sounds a bit weird, is there a better wording here?
> (I am not a native speaker)
>
>
> 16 cze 2022, 21:08 od pietervdvn at posteo.net:
>
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     In another step to make school tagging broadly usable, I did an
>     attempt to tackle the topic of special education today.
>
>     For this, I'd like to introduce a tag *school:for* which states
>     which is the target audience of a school, e.g. *school:for=autism*
>     if a school has decent facilities or focuses on students with autism.
>
>     As such, I did make a feature proposal on the wiki
>     <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Key:school:for>.
>     Please, write your comments on how this tagging scheme can still
>     be improved!
>
>     Kind regards,
>     Pieter Vander Vennet
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220616/52d00ff3/attachment.htm>