[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - information=qr_code
Greg Troxel
gdt at lexort.com
Tue Jun 21 10:53:09 UTC 2022
Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> writes:
> what you propose as alternative tagging?
I really don't know. This is really "there is sign a sign here with
contents X". I would hope a code with a URL for more is a minor
aspect.
so perhaps
information:qr=yes
information:qr:contents=wwhatever
and if there is tourism=information in its own right, that's fine, and a
bare qr without something that qualifies as information would just have
the above.
(And, is it really qr, or is it "machine-readable encoding of
information", as there are other barcode formats. But maybe qr means
'some encoding' to the general public.)
> 20 cze 2022, 15:51 od gdt at lexort.com:
>
>>
>> My own contrarian take is that QR codes are not actually
>> 'tourism=information'. They are a (not very good) pointer to
>> information which is *not actually present* at the node.
>>
>> If we do map them, suggestions:
>>
>> have some way to denote if the information in the code is actually
>> present in a human-readable way, like a printed URL. I view QR codes
>> without the content also printed to be deficient.
>>
>> Don't use tourism=information, because a QR code sticker on something
>> is not generally useful, and tourism=information is expected to be.
>> Some other kind of tag I don't really object to. My point is that our
>> tagging is hierarchical and there are implied semantics for the group.
>> A bare QR code doesn't fit the information semantics in a real sense,
>> even though it does in some nonuseful technical sense.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220621/45a3e268/attachment.sig>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list