[Tagging] RFC amenity=monastery

Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdreist at gmail.com
Sun Jun 26 12:06:04 UTC 2022



sent from a phone

> On 26 Jun 2022, at 13:29, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> 
> This tag is accepted, proposal cannot redefine it...
> 
> What is the benefit of proposal at that point?


I admit I did not like the current status of the proposal, in 2019 it was changed by FKV from defacto to proposed, in 2020 it was moved from proposed to undefined by Kioska Journo with the comment “ move to undefined because it seems to be used de facto)”
and now you had changed it from undefined to inactive.
At this point I reactivated it with the aim to achieve “approved” status, which is more to my liking than “inactive” or undefined.

Cheers Martin 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220626/f10c5b64/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list