[Tagging] RFC amenity=monastery

[Mateusz Konieczny]

26 cze 2022, 14:06 od dieterdreist at gmail.com:

>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>
>> On 26 Jun 2022, at 13:29, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>>
>> This tag is accepted, proposal cannot redefine it...
>>
>> What is the benefit of proposal at that point?
>>
>
>
> I admit I did not like the current status of the proposal, in 2019 it was changed by FKV from defacto to proposed, in 2020 it was moved from proposed to undefined by Kioska Journo with the comment “>  move to undefined because it seems to be used de facto)”
> and now you had changed it from undefined to inactive.
> At this point I reactivated it with the aim to achieve “approved” status, which is more to my liking than “inactive” or undefined.
>

Why status of archived proposal would matter at all?

See banner
with link to actual documentation page at archive proposals such as
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/pet_shop 
or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/tobacco

Maybe that banner should be far larger and noticeable?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220626/32bc9ba7/attachment-0001.htm>