[Tagging] address numbers for non existent objects

[Georges Dutreix]

Thank you Graeme, this is indeed the same scheme.

And the remark of Mateusz "importing adresses that will be likely in use 
in say 10 years is considered OK..." seems wise.


Le 15/03/2022 à 23:03, Graeme Fitzpatrick a écrit :
>
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 at 23:48, Georges Dutreix via Tagging 
> <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>     I am sorry but I have been unable to find an english source
>     describing
>     what we call "metric numbering system". 
>
>
> Here's a couple for you, Georges:
> Just from a local Council: 
> https://www.trc.qld.gov.au/services-and-facilities/roads/rural-addressing/
>
> State Govt (Rural Addressing): 
> https://www.qld.gov.au/environment/land/title/addressing/how-determined
>
> & yes, I've tagged quite a few addresses under this scheme!
>
> Thanks
>
> Graeme
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220316/a8cab811/attachment.htm>