[Tagging] Landcover... not again?....!

[Mateusz Konieczny]

May 6, 2022, 12:24 by pelderson at gmail.com:

> It's going off in all directions again...
>
> I asked: 
> What about the idea of supporting the proposed landcover values to the natural key?
>
> That is: for the natural key, support the values grass and trees.
>
deprecating landuse=grass and replacing it with natural=grass?
I see no real benefit here.

The same goes to adding third confusing synonym to landuse=forest
and natural=wood (to close to natural=tree)


> It just solves the issue that you can't map land cover and land use for the same feature if landuse is used for land cover. 
>
there is no such issue, you can map this with overlapping areas

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220506/1c930117/attachment.htm>