[Tagging] Tag: playability

[martianfreeloader]

I agree on the number of values.

I simply adopted the values from smoothness, but for both keys 
(smoothness, playability), I think a few values less would do just fine.


On 29/05/2022 19:47, Martin Fischer wrote:
> On 5/29/22 2:27 PM, martianfreeloader wrote:
>> Some time ago, I introduced the playability=* tag to offer data 
>> consumers information about the quality and hence potential enjoyment 
>> and/or risk of injury of sports courts. I documented general usage 
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playability and table tennis 
>> specific usage 
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dtable_tennis
> 
> I think such a tag makes sense but having so many values seems excessive 
> (excellent, good, intermediate, bad, very_bad, horrible, very_horrible, 
> unplayable), I'd limit it to just (excellent, good, intermediate, bad).
> 
> And I'd argue that unplayable pitches shouldn't be mapped as 
> leisure=pitch anyway but rather abandoned:leisure=pitch.[1]
> 
> [1]: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/abandoned:leisure=pitch
> 
> -Martin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging