[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - net for sports pitches
Dave F
davefoxfac63 at btinternet.com
Mon May 30 13:07:30 UTC 2022
On 29/05/2022 18:42, martianfreeloader wrote:
> I think the tag is very helpful. I'd find it a pity if we'd not be
> able to approve a simple yes/no tag.
>
> Yes, in some cases, it may be more complicated than that, but what
> about the majority of cases where the answer is very clear and simple?
It's not the binary yes/no that's the problem. it's the unknown
frequency with which it alternates.
IMO such transient information doesn't belong in the OSM database.
> You could argue in similar fashion against almost all other tagging
> schemes:
> - sidewalk=left/right/both : What if it exists only on 90% of the length?
> - covered=yes/no : What if it is only partially of sometimes covered?
> - internet=yes/no : What if only some parts of the cafe have wifi?
> - capacity=* for a parking lot: What if it doesn't have clear markings
> and depending on the size of vehicles and the way people park it can
> hold anything from 40 to 50 cars?
> - colour=* : What if some parts of the building have a different colour?
> - the list could go on forever
All those examples miss my point.
DaveF
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the Tagging
mailing list