[Tagging] Free of charge segments of formally paid road

[Paul Johnson]

What's wrong with toll=no for the untolled segments?

On Tue, May 31, 2022, 05:03 Alexey Zakharenkov <a-zakh at yandex.ru> wrote:

> Hello, mappers.
>
> Formally paid roads may have segments free of charge. Let's consider a
> long road which, by documents, is declared to be paid, a billboard at its
> beginning containing a notice "N-th to M-th km of the road is paid". Still
> there may be segments which can be entered and left without actual need to
> pay. It's possible if two other roads are connected to the paid road
> between two consecutive toll booths/gantries and if the road operator
> allows such maneuver.
>
> I ask for advice of the better method to tag such segments, which
> (according to wiki) must not have toll=yes tag. My ideas are:
>
> 1) toll=designated
>
> I think this is a good usage of well established 'designated' value to
> indicate that something has a signature of having some property. This
> should not even break software that relies on toll=yes/no boolean logic
> because only toll=yes/1/true is logical TRUE whereas no/designated/whatever
> is FALSE.
>
> 2) toll:designated=yes
>
> is good because it does not interfere with existing tags.
>
> Best regards,
> Alexey
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220531/0db4df63/attachment.htm>