[Tagging] Deprecation proposal: man_made=drinking_fountain
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Sat Oct 8 05:49:21 UTC 2022
On 7/10/22 23:43, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Am Fr., 7. Okt. 2022 um 13:46 Uhr schrieb ael <witwall3 at disroot.org>:
>
> Maybe. I guess that if I was starting from scratch, I might have a
> general tag of water_feature and find choose suitable values to
> describe
> these things.
>
>
>
>
> then I am happy we do not start from scratch :)
> There are so many different kind of water features, that would be
> useless without additional tags, just like amenity=social_facility,
> there are already so many diffferent types of fountains, imagine if
> this was taken away and we'd have to start to disambiguate "water
> feature". And some fountains aren't about water at all (champagne,
> chocolate, ...) although these are really few in comparison, and
> typically not in the public space.
A decorative fountain does not have to 'spurt water up into the air'..
Example Tom Bass Wall Fountain, Sydney, Australia 1963. Nicknamed "The
Urinal" for obvious reasons!
photo https://tbsss.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/39-PO.jpg
youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDmNkZm2KMw
The photos are decorative fountains .. to me. It may be possible to
obtain drinking water from them, but to me visually they are for the
most part decorative.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221008/33718bb3/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list