[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Water outlet
Warin
61sundowner at gmail.com
Sun Oct 9 07:49:27 UTC 2022
On 9/10/22 18:37, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 9 Oct 2022, at 08:50, Warin <61sundowner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'll be voting no.
>
>
> me too, it is trying to deprecate a handful of tags I am using for
> fountain classification. Why do people have to “deprecate” other
> people’s tags when they introduce new ones with different semantics?
>
> How can a “water outlet” tag replace a tag that represents the whole
> fountain?
>
> I also don’t like unnecessarily convoluted tags of this kind:
>
> * water_supply:for
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:water_supply:for&action=edit&redlink=1>=bottles
> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:water_supply:for%3Dbottles&action=edit&redlink=1>
>
>
> and usually a water outlet is not “for bottles” but compatible with
> filling bottles.
Some water outlets are designed for filling water bottles, just as some
are designed for drinking from, showering...
I wonder why showers are not yet a fountain= thing.. someone has not
thought of it yet?
Other possible fountain values? trough? If it has water .. must be a
fountain looks to be the mantra.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221009/6e2974e3/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list