[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Bench: replace seats by capacity

martianfreeloader martianfreeloader at posteo.net
Mon Oct 10 12:16:14 UTC 2022


Hi Mitja,

I've drafted two opposing proposals on whether capacity/seats should be 
tagged on benches without a functional separation into seats or not.

The purpose is to find out if there is a community consensus on this 
question.

"Sure, it's fine to tag capacity, even if there is now functional 
separation":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bench:_Tag_capacity,_even_if_no_separation

"No way! -- This is not objective":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bench:_Do_not_tag_capacity_if_no_separation

*NOTE:* Please discuss *both* proposals on the discussion page with the 
positive statement:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Bench:_Do_not_tag_capacity_if_no_separation




On 10/10/2022 14:07, Matija Nalis wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 14:20:09 +0200 (CEST), Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>> This revert makes sense to me.
>>
>> BTW, one may count both seats and capacity on benches, why not
> 
> One might even decide to tag
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:length
> 
> instead (or in addition) to `seats`, as is it actually (reproducably) measurable instead of guessable
> (i.e. are we talking about how many thinly 3 years olds _or_ have super-obese adults can fit there?)
> 



More information about the Tagging mailing list