[Tagging] RFC - More sensible values for fountain=*

[Martin Koppenhoefer]

sent from a phone

> On 11 Oct 2022, at 12:06, Davidoskky <davidoskky at yahoo.it> wrote:
> 
> I do agree, and that is also my objective; but I do like the idea of having a very generic value you can fall back to when no other value applies.


I don’t like the idea, because it will only slow down development of significant tags. Either the fountain you want to tag fits into an existing category, or you invent a new one, or you simply don’t put this detail. Filling in a generic placeholder is not helpful.



> 
> 
>> this alternative tagging is just a temporary hickup which will wash out automatically I guess, but we could try to speed it up.
> Sure, but I see no reason for showing it on the wiki.


reason is that people use it. 


Cheers Martin 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221011/55d0a82b/attachment.htm>