[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Historic

[Brian M. Sperlongano]

I appreciate the effort here, but I think it's too broad.  I would rather
have a more focused look at individual keys that considers what the tagging
alternatives are to each, and to assess whether there is duplication and/or
debates surrounding them that are worth investigating.  There is really no
profound need to "approve" the historic key as a whole.

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 9:18 AM martianfreeloader <
martianfreeloader at posteo.net> wrote:

> Hello.
>
> I’m proposing to approve the historic=* key together with a number of tags:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Historic
>
> historic=* is in widespread use and currently documented as de facto.
>
> Please comment wherever you feel most comfortable:
> - Here
> - On the wiki talk page
> - In the forum
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221011/fd24b234/attachment.htm>