[Tagging] RFC - More sensible values for fountain=*

Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com
Wed Oct 12 08:32:49 UTC 2022


On 11/10/22 23:35, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 11 Oct 2022, at 13:30, Davidoskky via Tagging <tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>>
>> How would you tag this fountain I photographed the other day?
>>
>> The water is not potable, the stream of water cannot be interrupted and definitely is not a decorative fountain.
>>
>> https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Water_fountain_without_tap_near_Santiago_de_Compostela.jpg
>
> it is a historic fountain

Historic? I think 'old' is the only thing that can be determined from 
the photo?


> that IMHO clearly is decorative, that stuff in the background doesn’t seem to be there by incident. Maybe it is also a historic watering place (seems small for this)? Not knowing the context I cannot tell you for sure what it is. amenity=fountain doesn’t seem off. Many “decorative” fountains also had utility.


I don't think the stream of water is the most useful feature .. it is 
the water in the trough for animals to drink from .. horses, donkeys .. 
etc.. I am assuming the lower structure contains some level of water 
simply by its shape.




More information about the Tagging mailing list