[Tagging] RFC - More sensible values for fountain=*

Graeme Fitzpatrick graemefitz1 at gmail.com
Fri Oct 14 23:00:43 UTC 2022


On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 20:10, Davidoskky via Tagging <
tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:

>
> I don't think the wall is so important frankly, but let's assume we agree
> on that.
>
> This fountain has the wall and thus is decorative and is amenity=fountain.
>
>
> https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e6/Water_fountain_without_tap_near_Santiago_de_Compostela.jpg


Personally, looking at that photo, I don't think that the whole thing was
originally built as a fountain?

Just looking at the quality of the construction & carving on the wall
itself, then the fairly rough & shoddy plumbing, I think it looks more like
the wall was built as a decorative feature, & then at some later stage, a
couple of holes were cut through it & two water pipes installed, draining
into an added trough.

So what does that make it?

A decorative fountain? I wouldn't have said so.

Drinking tap? Non-potable so no.

I'm thinking maybe just an amenity=watering_place
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dwatering_place would
be the best option?

Thanks

Graeme
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20221015/9b4f79a5/attachment.htm>


More information about the Tagging mailing list