[Tagging] parking conditions on separately mapped parking areas / harmonise access and parking:condition tags

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Sep 2, 2022, 15:31 by supaplex at riseup.net:
> 1. We use the established tags for parking lots also on        street-side parking areas (access=*, fee=*, maxstay=*... and        their conditional restrictions).

impossible, as road access and street-side parking areas may have different
access, fee and maxstay status

prefixing would be needed, and at this point this tags are not so established
anymore

in case that I am confused: how in variant 1 you would tag road usable by anyone
with "residents only" parking lane?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/parking_conditions_on_separately_mapped_parking_areas
seems to not have variant 1 linear examples

> 2. We adopt the parking:condition=*-scheme for street-side        parking areas

I am not too happy about this, that brings extra complexity where it is not
needed

> 3. We fundamentally resolve this conflict by adopting the common        OSM access scheme to the parking:lane/condition scheme.
I will read it and will comment if I will have anything useful

>
> I have illustrated these variants and some of their advantages      and disadvantages: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/parking_conditions_on_separately_mapped_parking_areas
>
>
area features would benefit from marking which variant is used now
(second column, right?) and maybe moving it to the first column

how amenity=parking access=private fee=no would be tagged in a schema 2?

>
> ...and wonder which variant would have the most support in the      community or what you think about it in general. Ideally, we will      gain an opinion on which of these variants should be      continued/proposed/documented.
>
>
there is also option (4) - keep things unchanged



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220903/15d4b7d8/attachment.htm>