[Tagging] RFC: Removal of Eruvs from OSM, and further boundry=religious

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Sep 5, 2022, 19:22 by frederik at remote.org:

> And I am not sure if "a wire strung along poles" would be sufficient to map a religious boundary or maybe just man_made=wire, support=poles ;) at least I'd like to know how someone can distinguish an "eruv boundary wire" from "just some wire someone strung up between poles".
>
Ask local people with knowledge specifically about this area.

Some name=* I mapped require the same.

> But leaving that aside for a moment, is there agreement that something physical needs to be there for a religious boundary to be mapped, or do people also accept the mapping of 100% "on paper" religious boundaries which can only be verified by cross-checking with third-party sources?
>
I am not happy about that, would prefer to not have that in OSM,
 but I did nothing to delete them

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20220905/92be2806/attachment.htm>