[Tagging] RFC: Removal of Eruvs from OSM, and further boundry=religious

[Marc_marc]

Hello,

Le 05.09.22 à 19:22, Frederik Ramm a écrit :
> is there agreement that something physical needs to be there for a 
> religious boundary to be mapped, or do people also accept the mapping of 
> 100% "on paper" religious boundaries which can only be verified by 
> cross-checking with third-party sources?

the issue isn't "is there agreement ?"
ppl map not-physical boundary
the problem is rather that we don't have tools to for example
detect that a non-physical border of a country is 5km away
from the opendata used to add it in osm

Regards,
Marc