[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - site_type=defensive_settlement

[Anne-Karoline Distel]

There are apps for that. ;-) For trees, I mean. But thanks for adding
them anyway.

Anne

On 20/09/2022 20:03, martianfreeloader wrote:
> I agree.
>
> We have loads of tags that only mappers with special knowledge can use
> correctly (just dive into the world of railways). This doesn't mean
> these tags shouldn't used by those who know what they're doing.
>
> When it comes to trees, I'm a quite "ordinary" mapper. I have no idea
> how to use genus=*. I still find the tag very much deserves to exist.
>
> On 20/09/2022 20:16, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>>
>> sent from a phone
>>
>>> On 20 Sep 2022, at 18:07, Joseph Eisenberg
>>> <joseph.eisenberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This proposed tag would be used for much less well known sites. How
>>> should ordinary mappers determine if a ruin is an old fort or a
>>> fortified settlement or a an ancient prison?
>>
>>
>> either there will be a sign explaining what you see, or other sources
>> like guides, or if you do not know it you cannot tag it.
>>
>> Cheers Martin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging