[Tagging] Combining "locked=yes" with various access tags
Zeev Stadler
zeev.stadler at gmail.com
Tue Feb 21 14:16:58 UTC 2023
I would like the help of the list to clarify the meaning of having a
"locked=yes" tag on a barrier node together with some allowed access tags.
The introduction to the "locked" tag wiki page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:locked says:
access <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access>=* is used to
> describe the legal permission to travel through a barrier but does not
> indicate in emergencies what the physical access is
>
Therefore, my understanding is that
1. As far as non-emergency routing, the "locked" tag should be ignored.
2. A "locked=no" tag indicates that a legal access restriction is not
enforced by a lock and therefore could be overcome in case of an emergency.
3. A "locked=yes" tag indicates that the legal access restriction is
enforced by a lock and therefore cannot be overcome in case of an
emergency.
The "How to map" description in the wiki page seems to assume a gate or a
barrier with a simple "access=no". It is not clear with respect to any
permitted access methods.
For example, barrier node with the following tags:
tag value
barrier gate
motor_vehicle no
locked yes
bicycle yes
foot yes
I think this tagging says:
- There is a locked gate that blocks motor vehicles
- There are no access restrictions for pedestrians and bikes
This is not the interpretation of other people, as seen in a discussion on
a GraphHopper routing issue
https://github.com/graphhopper/graphhopper/issues/2757#issuecomment-1434806229
There you could also find a picture of such a barrier.
Please help us resolve the differences
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20230221/b79c26e2/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list