[Tagging] Combining "locked=yes" with various access tags

[Marc_marc]

Feb 21, 2023, 15:24 by zeev.stadler at gmail.com:

>      1. As far as non-emergency routing, the "locked" tag should be ignored.

it is up to the person doing the routing to decide (and if I were him,
I would impose a penalty: getting out of the vehicle and opening
the barrier takes more time than going through a route of the
same distance without a barrier

>      2. A "locked=no" tag indicates that a legal access restriction is
>         not enforced by a lock and therefore could be overcome in case
>         of an emergency.

i agree

>      3. A "locked=yes" tag indicates that the legal access restriction
>         is enforced by a lock and therefore cannot be overcome in case
>         of an emergency.

legal or not, it's enforced

Le 21.02.23 à 15:34, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging a écrit :

> That is better mapped by mapping path around barrier,  
> at least in my opinion.

maybe for a barrier=gate

but a barrier=lift_gate/swing_gate hat is less wide than the whole road
is not really a barrier + a path that goes around the barrier.
ditto if for a dual retractable barrier=bollard  blocking vehicles
but pedestrians and cyclists pass in the middle
ditto for a lcoked barrier=gate with a unlocked barrier=wicket_gate
part of it to still allow pedestrian access

Regards,
Marc