[Tagging] Combining "locked=yes" with various access tags

[Warin]

On 24/2/23 10:39, Greg Troxel wrote:
> Niels Elgaard Larsen <elgaard at agol.dk> writes:
>
>> We have to accept that the tagging is never complete. And when
>> surveying, it is often easier to tag "locked" than "access" (we can se
>> the lock or try to open the gate but there are often no signs). So the
>> tagging might reflect that we know that a gate is usually locked, but
>> we do not know who can use the gate.
>>
>> At least "locked" should imply access=destination or private for
>> routers.
> I don't see it that why.  access=private, probably.  access=destination
> means you can use a way if you decide to go someplace that you need to
> use the way to get to.  But that's wrapped up with can you.
>
> It's a little unclear to me what a "locked=no" gate is.  I'm guessing
> it's a physical barrier than anyone can easily move out of the way.  So
> arguably a barrier without locked shouldn't preclude routing, just a
> 2-minute delay.


Commonly used on country roads to stop stock wandering. The 'rule' is 
leave the gate as you found it - open or closed.

On occasion I have found the gate latch 'inventive' .. I have spent 5 
minutes figuring out how to close the thing!