[Tagging] Direct reduced iron plants
Daniel Evans
daniel.fred.evans at gmail.com
Fri Apr 26 12:27:15 UTC 2024
Hi Martin,
Thanks. I have been partly lost between some competing (but perhaps poorly
supported) proposals which suggested more focus on making the `industrial=`
tag more detailed. I'll give some thought to what a sequence of `works:x`
tags might look like.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 12:47, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdreist at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 26 Apr 2024, at 13:11, Daniel Evans <daniel.fred.evans at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > It sounds like your feeling is that the tagging of industrial sites
> should be closer to power=plant and the associated plant:x tags.
>
>
>
> I say it already is like this. The meaning of landuse=industrial is land
> used for industrial purposes. If you add something like
> industrial=steelmaking or steel_mill or steel etc. to it, it means steel
> industry. It doesn’t say this is a steel plant, rather grounds used for the
> steel industry (there are steel mills but it doesn’t say if there’s one,
> two or even more).
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20240426/574fece7/attachment.htm>
More information about the Tagging
mailing list