[Tagging] [RFC] Feature Proposal - works:type and works:process

[Daniel Evans]

(Apologies for double-posting)

Another suggestion on the Wiki is to just use works= directly instead of
works:type. It's actually already used in that way in about 1000 cases. Not
sure how I missed that!

Cheers,
Daniel

On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 09:50, Daniel Evans <daniel.fred.evans at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Marc,
>
> Thanks for the feedback - now you've mentioned it, I can definitely see
> the problem.
>
> works:industry= is an option which is much clearer about exactly what the
> tag means. Does that sound good to you?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 00:12, Marc_marc via Tagging <
> tagging at openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thanks for the time you spend on that.
>>
>> Le 26.04.24 à 20:37, Daniel Evans a écrit :
>> >
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Works:type_and_works:process
>>
>> :type is a meaningless suffix
>> it could be :type=big<>small, green<>polluting, local<>not local, ...
>>
>> could you please find a better descriptive key ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Marc
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20240427/5f0cf38f/attachment.htm>