[Tagging] Difference between "yes" and "designated" in access tags

[Szem]

There was a similar conversation in the Hungarian community as well. I 
would like to ask what you think about such (and similar) official 
bicycle route signs:
https://www.google.hu/maps/@47.4675022,18.8055463,3a,35.3y,85.25h,81.51t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s_4lLYsjnTzP_R_swduneHg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
https://www.google.hu/maps/@47.4653939,18.8056303,3a,16.7y,337.24h,87.52t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s5KRYaFzRIWPFrMwQBrYf9g!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu
do they imply a bicycle=designated value for the road if it is not a 
cycleway (because it is unnecessary for that), or is it enough to just 
put the lcn/rcn etc. value on the road.
Thanks, Szem

2024.04.30. 09:09 keltezéssel, Martin Koppenhoefer írta:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
>> On 30 Apr 2024, at 08:51, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefitz1 at gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>     In fact, some bicycle trails are signed where
>>     cycling is illegal
>>
>>
>> So does that then make it legal?
>
>
> no, in Germany it also happens from time to time that we discover 
> signposted bicycle routes where cycling is legally forbidden, often 
> presumably because the signs are not “correct” (not what is intended), 
> and the legal conclusion from such a situation is you have to push the 
> bike on such sections. Route markers do not change legal accessibility 
> as defined by traffic signs.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20240430/9d3f5259/attachment.htm>