[Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal – Deprecate crossing=zebra in favor of crossing:markings

[Volker Schmidt]

crossing:markings=yes is useful for the frequent cases that the markings do
not correspond to any of your editors presets (frequent here in Italy)

On Sat, 10 May 2025, 14:40 Peter Elderson, <pelderson at gmail.com> wrote:

> LS
> I voted against this proposal. It has merits, but also some aspects I
> don't support, such as the unnecessary deprecation; the suggestion to use
> crossing=uncontrolled where many zebra crossings are controlled crossings;
> and the promotion of the lame tag crossing:markings=yes which should be
> crossing:markings=<markings>.
> It's a package deal, so if one thing is not acceptable for me, I can only
> vote against the whole package.
>
> Peter Elderson
>
>
> Op vr 9 mei 2025 om 23:08 schreef bauer33333--- via Tagging <
> tagging at openstreetmap.org>:
>
>> Dear mailing list,
>>
>> Voting has started for "Deprecate crossing=zebra in favor of
>> crossing:markings".
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Deprecate_crossing%3Dzebra_in_favor_of_crossing:markings
>> As there have been significant changes to the proposal since the start of
>> the RFC I encourage you to read it again before voting.
>>
>> Bauer33333
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20250510/0abbaf77/attachment.htm>