[Tagging] [Voting] Feature Proposal – Deprecate crossing=zebra in favor of crossing:markings

[Mateusz Konieczny]

> lame tag crossing:markings=yes which should be crossing:markings=<markings>

I can be (barely) persuaded to mark crossing:markings=yes but I do not care about
these things to the point of giving specific value

I guess if you consider crossing:markings=yes worse than no tagging at all then
it may make sense to dismiss it

> suggestion to use crossing=uncontrolled where many zebra crossings are controlled crossings

note that "crossing=uncontrolled" is not for uncontrolled crossings in their common meaning
(one more reason to get rid of crossing= key altogether)
Though proposal is not clear about what should be done with zebra crossings that have traffic lights.
May 10, 2025, 10:42 by pelderson at gmail.com:

> LS
> I voted against this proposal. It has merits, but also some aspects I don't support, such as the unnecessary deprecation; the suggestion to use crossing=uncontrolled where many zebra crossings are controlled crossings; and the promotion of the lame tag crossing:markings=yes which should be crossing:markings=<markings>.
> It's a package deal, so if one thing is not acceptable for me, I can only vote against the whole package.
>
> Peter Elderson
>
>
> Op vr 9 mei 2025 om 23:08 schreef bauer33333--- via Tagging <> tagging at openstreetmap.org> >:
>
>> Dear mailing list,
>>  
>> Voting has started for "Deprecate crossing=zebra in favor of crossing:markings".
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Deprecate_crossing%3Dzebra_in_favor_of_crossing:markings
>> As there have been significant changes to the proposal since the start of the RFC I encourage you to read it again before voting.
>>  
>> Bauer33333
>> _______________________________________________
>>  Tagging mailing list
>>  >> Tagging at openstreetmap.org
>>  >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/attachments/20250511/bbd899c3/attachment-0001.htm>