[Talk-alps] wilderness mountain buildings

[ale_zena at libero.it]

I'm agree with you. I don't think the difference would be a matter of dimension 
or concrete vs wood material, but rather I'd prefer choose among:
Alpine_hut / 
Wilderness_hut / Lean_to
Now someone has also added "Bivvy" but basically all 
they could be categorizing under 3 type. Less relevant feature could be added 
with the tag description=dimension:xx sq m, fireplace, n beds, made of  ...


Ale_Zena_IT

>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: sylvain at letuffe.org
>Data: 
20/08/2009 15.42
>A: <talk-alps at openstreetmap.org>
>Ogg: Re: [Talk-alps] 
wilderness mountain buildings

>
>Also there are a few thing I'm a bit unhappy 
with but have not the "prefect 
>solution".
>
>In the definition a bivacco 
(wish I called basic_hut) is very close to a 
>wilderness_hut and I'm missing 
the few points that makes them different. And 
>I suppose it's not good having 
tags that referes to same things.
>
>User :
>http://wiki.openstreetmap.
org/wiki/User:Bigshot
>(from italy I supposed) told me it is very different. 
It's a matter of less 
>comfort, smaller than other free rent huts, lower cold 
isolation. But 
>physical description is quite close to me.
>
>How would you 
describe the difference between a bivacco and other free rent 
>hut ?
>
>
>-- 

>sly