[talk-au] Cycleway/footway/path

[Roy Wallace]

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Ashley Kyd<ash at kyd.com.au> wrote:
> I'm really not
> convinced that [it's] a good idea, for renderer *or* semantics to tag a
> government-designated cycleway as a path with bike access.

So, something that's currently a highway=cycleway, right?

highway=path; bicycle=designated; foot=yes.

Why isn't that a good idea? All it does is take the
guesswork/ambiguity out of "cycleway", IMHO, as well as being more
extensible (in terms of snowmobiles/hovercraft/etc., and in terms of
"designated"/"official"/etc).