[talk-au] Alcohol Free Zones

[Craig Feuerherdt]

so if the park is only a rough guess, are you going to be able to define the
AFZ any better?
So long as the relation is attached to the polygon (or other feature), when
that feature gets updated so will the relation.
I will take a stab at doing one for Bendigo and post it onto the list for
discussion.


2009/12/30 John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>

> 2009/12/30 Craig Feuerherdt <craigfeuerherdt at gmail.com>:
> > The same thing happens here as well John.
> > So you are saying that specific playgrounds etc are AFZ's as well. So in
> > those instances they would be part of a relation (with a single object ie
> > the polygon representing the playground).
> > I think relations are the best option for AFZ's because they allow
> > flexibility to cover both scenarios. It is therefore easier for renders
> to
> > look at just relations when it comes to rendering them rather than tags
> and
> > relations.
>
> Perhaps relations would be good enough if you can map landuse areas,
> but in rural areas it's hard to map landuses, most parks are rough
> guesses.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20091230/86a54d21/attachment.html>