[talk-au] a mapping conflict in Sydney, help appreciated

info at 4x4falcon.com info at 4x4falcon.com
Sun Dec 5 23:26:31 GMT 2010


Are you sure this is the right changeset.

It only shows one deleted node and one new node.

Cheer
Ross

> On 5 December 2010 17:43, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think that this
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6545161 should be
>> reverted on the grounds that my source tags were deleted with no
>> better replacement (along with other tags deleated). I don't like that
>> this person has just deleted my hard work without even an explanation
>> as to why it was deleted. The same user did this exact same thing
>> before, and when I notified them about this and made the revert, they
>> just reverted my revert. I don't want to start an edit war, so I am
>> asking other mappers if you also think that this changeset was
>> deconstructive. If you do then hopefully we won't have an edit war.
>>
>> Previously I asked this user directly about data that appeared very
>> much like that from Google Maps, they said they may have copied
>> directly from a Google Map, in our exchanges they said to me, "I find
>> your tone condescending and offensive." Because of this I want to
>> avoid sending a message to them again, so I would much rather conduct
>> my communication in the public here.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
>





More information about the Talk-au mailing list