[talk-au] Distinguish between National, State etc parks

[Steve Bennett]

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Craig Feuerherdt
<craigfeuerherdt at gmail.com>wrote:

> I believe the Australian guidelines have been derived from international
> guidelines. The "natural=" and "landuse=" tags are confusing on the wiki as
> they switch between land use and land cover (as defined above). It would be
> good to document the Australian definition of the current tags so we get
> some consistency. I am happy to start something if others wish to
> contribute.
>
> For the purpose of OSM I believe land use and land cover are the 2
> important things. (Not too fussed with land cover at this stage, more
> interested in defining the boundary of the parks). I am happy to attribute
> polygons as generic administrative boundaries for the moment as we can
> always come back and attribute them as National, State etc parks later.
>

That all looks pretty sensible, though not sure whether "land management"
concerns us. Please do set up a list in the wiki giving some suggested tags
that we can argue over.

Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20100105/274110ad/attachment.html>