[talk-au] Fwd: Mapping progress in Victoria

[Roy Wallace]

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Craig Feuerherdt
<craigfeuerherdt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> They include all ways, not just vehicular roads.
> Essentially the State Government layer also contains some non-vehicular ways
> as well, so it is difficult to compare apples with apples.

Is the State Government criteria any more specific than "[vehicular
ways and] some non-vehicular ways"? It would be useful to put any
details you have on that page (providing it's permitted), so that the
numbers are actually meaningful. This would also make it easier to
compare "apples with apples", by selecting only the matching kinds of
ways from OSM.