[talk-au] access=destination

[Liz]

On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, John Smith wrote:
> We're tagging what the sign states, what it means will vary between
> legal jurisdictions...
> 
> __________________________________
> 
but first we have to find out what it really means, and what are the 
restrictions
how they compare to other restrictions which routers already understand
certainly access=destination sounds more like an oxymoron to me
I would have had access=destination_only
we understand local_traffic_only because they are our signs, but what does a 
routing engine understand?