[talk-au] Queensland parks, forests and conservation areas
markus_g at bigpond.com
Sun Jul 4 11:11:40 BST 2010
Had a look,
I like it.
It is good you also have added leisure=nature_reserve or landuse=forest as
it will render with default settings with mgkmap.
From: talk-au-bounces at openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-au-bounces at openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of James Livingston
Sent: Sunday, 4 July 2010 10:00 AM
To: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Queensland parks, forests and conservation areas
On 30/06/2010, at 7:48 AM, Roy Wallace wrote:
> Is it worth using an additional
> classification:qld=national_park|conservation_park|state_forest, etc.
> (or similar), just to make things extra clear?
> That is, when you use a rule like "Conservation Parks get
> boundary=protected_area", I think it would be nice to also record that
> they are a conservation_park.
On 30/06/2010, at 11:55 AM, Stephen Hope wrote:
> Are you actually going to put the fact that it is a State forest
> anywhere? Sure, landuse=forest is not a problem, but some sort of tag
> stating that it is a state forest (as opposed to private land) sounds
boundary=state_forest, and similar? They all have it in the name as well,
although that's obviously not ideal if you actually want to render them
I've put a small (~110kb) .osm file up at
http://www.sunsetutopia.com/qld_parks_ready.osm.bz2 which contains the
results of tagging and merging together the park sections (where they're
split in the original data). Magnetic Island is the most complicated one
I've done so far.
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
-------------- next part --------------
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 9.0.830 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2980 - Release Date: 07/04/10 04:05:00
More information about the Talk-au