[talk-au] Residential landuse

[Craig Feuerherdt]

+1
nothing is ever perfect in everyones eyes, but I can live with it :)

On 17 June 2010 15:19, Roy Wallace <waldo000000 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:11 PM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On 17 June 2010 14:09, Craig Feuerherdt <craigfeuerherdt at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I don't disagree Roy.
> >> I still argue that the land use isn't wholly residential and that these
> >> peri-urban areas are a distinct land use.
> >>
> >> The other alternative is another tag to help (those who want to)
> distinguish
> >> between types of landuse?
> >
> > You could always sub-type instead of a new type...
> >
> > landuse=residential
> > residential=semi-rural
>
> +1. Although I don't really see that much information is added by
> "residential=semi-rural", at least it stays out of the way :)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20100617/ce4940fa/attachment.html>