[talk-au] more broken boundaries

[Neil Penman]

It would be useful to have access to a layer showing boundaries sourced externally as they were when originally loaded. That way the current boundary state can always be compared with the original.

However the below email is a bit cryptic for me.  How are boundaries getting broken?  One of the attached changesets indicates that the purpose was to separate administrative boundaries from roads, whereas recently I have been tagging administrative boundaries with keys for highways or waterways that follow the same course. Is there a consensus on the right way to go on this?

--- On Fri, 5/3/10, John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com> wrote:

From: John Smith <deltafoxtrot256 at gmail.com>
Subject: [talk-au] more broken boundaries
To: "OSM Australian Talk List" <talk-au at openstreetmap.org>
Received: Friday, 5 March, 2010, 9:47 AM

Anyone have any suggestions on how to approach people accidently
breaking boundaries, or better yet thoughts on how to prevent them
from being broken in the first place?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/3358719
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4007178

etc...

_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au



      
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20100305/5d93bbab/attachment.html>