[talk-au] Incorrectly expanding abbreviations

[Liz]

On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Ben Kelley wrote:
> While I don't think it's particularly necessary to expand abbreviations for
> names (or contract for that matter), I certainly don't think it is invalid
> to do so.
> 
They are individual
It is necessary to find out what the correct designation is for each case
There are no generalisations.....

any other way to say this?