[talk-au] How many NearMap users do you think have accepted the new CTs and ODbL?

[John Smith]

On 27 April 2011 04:15, David Groom <reviews at pacific-rim.net> wrote:
> But I thought that Nearmap has said that they did not think the CT's were
> compatible with the use of their data.  As I understood it this had nothing
> to do with CC-BY-SA or ODbL.
>
> So the issue as I understand it is the CT's, and so anyone who has used
> Nearmap as a source and has agreed to the CT's is in violation of both
> Nearmap's licence, and the CT's.
>
> Of course my understanding of Nearmap's position may be wrong, and I suspect
> they (Ben?) will be able to clarify matters.

That's my understanding as well, even though some have suggested once
you agree you can't unagree, even though there is clear breaches of
contract with OSM-F.