[talk-au] Re-entering data to avoid licensing failure

Mark Pulley mrpulley at lizzy.com.au
Thu Dec 15 07:18:27 GMT 2011

Only if v1 is from a non-acceptor. I assumed from Ian's post that v1  
is from an acceptor. (Or have I read that wrong?)

Quoting Ross Scanlon <info at 4x4falcon.com>:
> Problem with this is that you are breaching copyright.
> Cheers
> Ross
> On 15/12/11 12:34, Ian Sergeant wrote:
>> For a couple of objects, I've just copied the v1 object, deleted the
>> current object, and reloaded into OSM with an attribution tag for the v1
>> author.
>> Ian.
>> On 15 December 2011 15:12, Ben Kelley <ben.kelley at gmail.com
>> <mailto:ben.kelley at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>    I think it's clear we need an automated way to remove
>>    non-new-ct-accepting edits from ways where v1 was by an acceptor.
>>        - Ben Kelley.

Mark P.

More information about the Talk-au mailing list