[talk-au] Re-entering data to avoid licensing failure
Mark Pulley
mrpulley at lizzy.com.au
Thu Dec 15 07:18:27 GMT 2011
Only if v1 is from a non-acceptor. I assumed from Ian's post that v1
is from an acceptor. (Or have I read that wrong?)
Quoting Ross Scanlon <info at 4x4falcon.com>:
> Problem with this is that you are breaching copyright.
> Cheers
> Ross
>
> On 15/12/11 12:34, Ian Sergeant wrote:
>> For a couple of objects, I've just copied the v1 object, deleted the
>> current object, and reloaded into OSM with an attribution tag for the v1
>> author.
>> Ian.
>>
>> On 15 December 2011 15:12, Ben Kelley <ben.kelley at gmail.com
>> <mailto:ben.kelley at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> I think it's clear we need an automated way to remove
>> non-new-ct-accepting edits from ways where v1 was by an acceptor.
>> - Ben Kelley.
Mark P.
More information about the Talk-au
mailing list