[talk-au] highway shields: AU

[John Smith]

On 4 January 2011 12:34, Richard Weait <richard at weait.com> wrote:
> Two reasons, so far.  We have found highways maintained outside the
> border of the expected jurisdiction.  So a NY shield is required in
> Pennsylvania.  But mostly because we have to describe the shield in
> the context of a file system, as well, to find the shield images.
> Finding the M shield is easier when we know if it should be the AU_M,
> UK_M or another.

Then tag the exception, rather than everything, and in the case of
Australia, which road exactly goes outside the country border?

>> If you must add something like this do it in post processing...
>
> We're not describing the jurisdiction, but the network, or essentially
> the shield background image.  It can't always be extracted from the
> location.

See above...