[talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of CT/license changes

[Sam Couter]

Steve Coast <steve at asklater.com> wrote:
> This is exactly right.

It's only exactly right if you don't have a problem with the new
licence, with the process by which it was implemented, with mass
deletion of data, with the proliferation of incompatible open licences,
with irrevocable and eternal rights grants, with future relicencing at
OSM-F's whim, etc.

Dismissing the objections of people who don't share your viewpoint as
some kind of hidden agenda or shitstirring for shitstirring's sake is
immature, childish and unproductive.

Failing to understand that others genuinely have different viewpoints
from you is a glaring failure for a man who's supposed to be a leader in
an open community.
-- 
Sam Couter         |  mailto:sam at couter.id.au
OpenPGP fingerprint:  A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05  5BD5 8530 03AE DE89 C75C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20110707/330991e0/attachment.pgp>