[talk-au] Inappropriate tagged areas

[Andy Townsend]

On 16/12/2015 21:58, Warin wrote:
> On 17/12/2015 8:35 AM, Ben Kelley wrote:
>
>> Use is not consistent.
>>
> Situation normal.
>>
>> (If you harvest the natural trees, which one is it?)
>>
>
> forestry.
>>
>> See the Forest page on the wiki,
>>
>

The http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest page describes 4 different 
approaches, and unfortunately because of the different approaches 
someone consuming the data will struggle beyond "here be trees" for any 
of them.  As I understand it that's why the approach of the OSM 
"Standard Style" is what it is (though there's no reason for mappers to 
try and capture more detail though).

Cheers,

Andy



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20151217/de7eb076/attachment.html>