[talk-au] Added Laneways and Buildings

[n]

I feel that those barriers are not to prevent cyclists but just to slow them down on approach to a roadway for safety. In Qld, cyclists are permitted to use footways, unless specifically signed otherwise, so probably unnecessary to add the tag bicycle=yes. I often/sometimes add the tag if it seems to me to be quite suitable for cyclists.
Nev

> On 10 Jan 2016, at 4:13 PM, David Findlay <davidjwfindlay at gmail.com <mailto:davidjwfindlay at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> Hi Nev,
> 
> Thanks for that. I wasn't sure how to tag them, but now you mention that I'll update them. Should bicycle=yes be applied to any laneway that is passable by bike, even if it does have those barriers? Thanks,
> 
> David
> 
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 3:03 PM Nev Wedding <nevwedding at gmail.com <mailto:nevwedding at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi David, welcome back.
> I did notice this changeset yesterday http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36457888 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36457888> that mentions cycle barriers but you did not add the tags for them to the paths.
> barrier=cycle_barrier
> bicycle=yes
> foot=yes
> 
> nev
> 
> 
>> On 10 Jan 2016, at 10:54 AM, David Findlay <davidjwfindlay at gmail.com <mailto:davidjwfindlay at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> It's been a while since I did anything for OSM. Moving to a new home and decided to fill in a few missing walking laneways, buildings and carparks in my area. They seem to have all validated properly, but I'd be happy to hear some critique on what I've added. I did check a the Australian Tagging Guide before upload.
>> 
>> See http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/David%20Findlay/history#map=13/-27.2279/153.0714 <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/David%20Findlay/history#map=13/-27.2279/153.0714>
>> 
>> I wouldn't mind upgrading the map for the local shopping centre as well so it shows internal layout and stores. Has that been done anywhere? Thanks,
>> 
>> David
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-au mailing list
>> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-au at openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20160110/379b36a3/attachment.html>