[talk-au] Checking on bug-fixes before committing changes.ta

[Nev Wedding]

> On 7 Jul 2016, at 7:37 PM, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harvey4 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7 Jul 2016 7:21 PM, "Simon Slater" <pyevet at iinet.net.au <mailto:pyevet at iinet.net.au>> wrote:
> >
> > G'day all,
> >         While waiting in the Balranald Bakery yesterday I thought I'd install
> > OSMBugs and OSMTracker and see what needed doing in the area.  Since this is
> > the first time I've done this, I've a couple of questions.
> >
> > 1/      POI without name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1950504127 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1950504127> has a
> > brand=Caltex tag.  To fix this one, which is better: change brand of Caltex to
> > operator or add operator=Caltex, leaving the brand tag?  Or is the operator
> > the proprietor and use the tag name= instead?  Locals just call it 'the
> > servo'.  The other Caltex is 'the roadhouse'
> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/206203789 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/206203789>
> I wouldn't remove the brand=Caltex because that is the branding of the service station right? If it's operated by Caltex you can add that tag too. It's common to see three tags brand, operator, and name all equal to Caltex.
> 
For the name, I would consider naming one ‘Caltex Service Station’ and the other ‘Caltex Roadhouse’ or as you prefer.
> Though for name you might also see things like "Caltex [Suburb]"
> 
> >
> > 2/      Fixme tagged item https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118043858 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118043858> is in the
> > right place by GPS and the other tags are correct.  Do I just delete the fixme
> > tag?  This would also apply for a couple of others.
> 
> Yes,if you've validated the thing the fixme tag was added for you can just delete the tag.
> 
> > 3/      With the correction needed for:
> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118043885 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118043885> to extend the divided road, is it
> > better to delete the single section, then add the divided section as 2 ways
> > down to Bank St, or move the single section to one side and add a parallel
> > way?
> 
> I prefer to move the single section and add another way parallel, because it retains the history of the way, but both approaches are valid. 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au at openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/attachments/20160707/829a7506/attachment-0001.html>